Probing Cosmic Expansion: The Cosmological Implications of Redshift
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Understanding the stretching of light wavelengths, or redshift, is essential for unraveling cosmic expansion and the structure of the universe. This paper investigates three redshift mechanisms: Doppler, cosmological, and relativistic redshift in the context of general relativity. While Doppler redshift applies primarily to nearby objects, cosmological redshift, governed by the expansion of the universe within the Friedmann-Lemaître-RobertsonWalker (FLRW) metric, becomes essential at cosmological distances, supporting the Big Bang model. The work of Edwin Hubble, which linked galaxy recessional velocities to their distances in what is now known as the Hubble-Lemaître law, provided a framework for measuring the expansion rate of the universe. Persistent discrepancies in this rate termed the “Hubble tension,” continue to inspire debate and investigation. Additionally, this paper highlights essential distance measurement methods used in redshift analysis. Technological advancements, including the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), are enhancing redshift accuracy, fostering new insights into dark matter, dark energy, and galaxy evolution, as well as probing the fundamental questions of the universe.
Introduction
Redshift is a fundamental concept in cosmology and astrophysics, referring to the observed increase in wavelength (or decrease in frequency) of light from an object moving away from the observer. This shift in light serves as key evidence for the universe’s expansion, and it plays a critical role in understanding the large-scale structure and dynamics of the cosmos. The redshift-distance relation describes how this redshift correlates with the distance of celestial objects from Earth, providing deep insights into the universe’s structure and expansion.
The foundation of this relationship was laid by Edwin Hubble in the late 1920s. His pioneering work, combined with Georges Lemaître’s contributions, established what is now known as the Hubble-Lemaître Law. This law connects the velocity of galaxies (derived from their redshifts) to their distance from the observer, with the proportionality constant known as the Hubble constant, which symbolizes the rate of the universe’s expansion [1], [2]. The redshift-distance relation remains central to modern cosmology, forming the cornerstone of the Lambda Cold Dark Matter model, which describes the universe’s structure, composition, and evolution [3], [4].
Traditional methods of measuring cosmic distances, such as parallax and Cepheid variable stars, were used before the advent of redshift studies to map local regions of the universe. Parallax involves observing the apparent shift in a star’s position against distant background stars as Earth orbits the Sun. For more distant objects, astronomers have relied on Cepheid variables, a type of star whose brightness varies predictably, making them reliable standard candles for measuring distances [5].
In more recent decades, several modern methods have further refined the accuracy of cosmic distance measurements, especially for distant galaxies. One such method is the use of Type Ia supernovae, which are standardized by their consistent peak luminosity. These supernovae were instrumental in discovering the universe’s accelerated expansion, revealing the presence of dark energy [6], [7]. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), caused by fluctuations in the early universe’s density, serve as a standard ruler to map cosmic distances on large scales, with surveys like SDSS and BOSS playing crucial roles [8].
Another important method is gravitational lensing, where massive galaxy clusters bend light from more distant objects, allowing astronomers to estimate the distances to both the lens and the source. Strong gravitational lensing, particularly when combined with time delays from multiple imaged sources, provides an independent measure of the Hubble constant [9]. Similarly, the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) technique has gained traction for refining distance measurements by using the brightness of red giant stars just before helium fusion [10].
Finally, a cutting-edge method involves using gravitational wave standard sirens. These events, such as binary neutron star mergers, emit both gravitational waves and electromagnetic signals, providing an independent approach to determining cosmic distances and refining the Hubble constant [11].
Recent advances in instruments like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Dark Energy Survey (DES) have allowed astronomers to make increasingly precise redshift and distance measurements, providing more accurate constraints on the universe’s expansion rate and structure. These techniques, alongside classical methods, form a robust framework for mapping the universe’s vast distances and understanding its evolution.
Theoretical Foundations of Redshift
Doppler Shift vs. Cosmological Redshift
Redshift, the stretching of light’s wavelength, arises from different mechanisms, with Doppler and cosmological redshift being the most significant. Doppler redshift occurs when an object moves away from an observer, and its velocity causes the light to shift, mathematically expressed as where is the speed of light. This effect is prominent in nearby galaxies or objects within our galaxy. In cosmology, the dominant mechanism is cosmological redshift, which is caused by the expansion of the universe. As light travels through space, the universe expands, and the wavelength of light stretches, described by the relation where is the scale factor of the universe [12], [13]. This form of redshift is critical for understanding the large-scale structure of the universe and is central to observational cosmology, providing insights into the universe’s expansion and supporting the Big Bang theory [3].
Relativistic Redshift
In general relativity, the expansion of the universe is elegantly modeled by the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, a solution to Einstein’s field equations for a homogeneous and isotropic universe. This metric is foundational in cosmology, as it provides a framework for understanding the large-scale structure of the universe and explains the observed redshift of distant galaxies as an effect of space itself expanding rather than the galaxies moving through space.
The FLRW metric leads to a redshift-distance relation that is derived from the changing scale factor, , over time. Mathematically, this relation is given by:
where is the scale factor at the time the light was emitted, and is the scale factor when the light is observed. This relationship implies that as the universe expands, the wavelengths of light traveling through it are stretched, producing the observed redshift. This redshift is thus a cosmological redshift rather than a Doppler shift due to actual motion through space [14]–[16].
Recent studies reinforce that the FLRW metric remains a successful model for describing our universe’s expansion on large scales, although some research explores potential modifications to account for observed phenomena such as the Hubble tension and dark energy [17]. Observational data from projects like the Dark Energy Survey continue to support the predictions made by the FLRW metric, validating its application to a universe dominated by dark matter and dark energy [18].
The Hubble-Lemaître Law
Early Observations
Edwin Hubble’s 1929 discovery fundamentally transformed our view of the cosmos, demonstrating that galaxies are receding from us at velocities that increase with their distance, which provided the first solid evidence for an expanding universe. Building on earlier redshift measurements by Vesto Slipher, who observed that galaxies (then referred to as “nebulae”) showed redshifts indicative of outward motion, Hubble used precise distance and redshift data to quantify this relationship [1], [19]. He found that the recession velocity of galaxies is directly proportional to their distance , which is expressed as:
where is the Hubble constant. This proportionality constant embodies the rate of expansion of the universe. Hubble’s findings were a cornerstone for the development of modern cosmology and provided the observational basis for the Big Bang theory [20].
Today, Hubble’s law is supported by a variety of observational techniques, such as those using Type Ia supernovae and the cosmic microwave background, further refining and enhancing our understanding of cosmic expansion [21].
The Hubble Constant
The exact value of the Hubble constant, , has been a persistent topic of debate and refinement in cosmology. Edwin Hubble’s early measurements suggested an expansion rate of around , a figure far higher than current estimates. Today, the value of is believed to lie between and , depending on the measurement technique employed. Observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), particularly from the Planck satellite, estimate at around , based on conditions in the early universe [22]. In contrast, local distance ladder techniques using Type Ia supernovae and Cepheid variable stars suggest a higher value, closer to 73–74 km/s/Mpc [3].
This discrepancy, known as the “Hubble tension,” remains a significant and unresolved issue in cosmology. Some researchers speculate that the tension may point to unknown physics or a need for adjustments in the standard cosmological model, possibly involving changes in dark energy behavior, new particles, or alternative gravitational theories [21], [23], [24]. As a result, the Hubble tension continues to inspire new studies and hypotheses, highlighting its importance in understanding the universe’s expansion history [25]–[27].
Redshift and Cosmological Distance Measures
Luminosity Distance
The concept of luminosity distance, , is fundamental in observational cosmology, connecting the intrinsic luminosity of an astronomical object with the flux observed from Earth. It is mathematically expressed as:
where represents the object’s intrinsic luminosity, and is the flux observed by a distant observer.
In an expanding universe, as per general relativity and cosmological models, the luminosity distance becomes a function of the object’s redshift . Since the redshift is influenced by the expansion rate of the universe, studying across various redshifts provides insights into the universe’s geometry and expansion history. The Hubble–Lemaitre law establishes that redshift is approximately proportional to distance for nearby galaxies, while for more distant objects, the luminosity distance depends on the cosmological model parameters, such as the Hubble constant , dark energy, and matter density.
In recent years, studies using Type Ia supernovae and standard candles (objects of known intrinsic luminosity) have helped refine our understanding of the luminosity distance and redshift relation, particularly in probing the accelerated expansion of the universe attributed to dark energy [28]–[30]. Type Ia supernovae serve as reliable standard candles due to their consistent peak luminosity, making them instrumental in luminosity distance measurements and, consequently, in the study of cosmic acceleration.
Recent advancements in astronomical observations, notably from surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), have also enriched our understanding of and its dependence on redshift. These large datasets allow for precise measurements of the luminosity distance for galaxies at varying redshifts, contributing to constraints on cosmological parameters [4], [31]. Additionally, the gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star mergers provide a complementary approach to distance measurement, with calculated from gravitational wave signals offering a promising alternative to electromagnetic methods [32]–[34].
In the context of theoretical frameworks, modifications to general relativity, such as those involving inhomogeneous cosmologies and alternate models of dark energy, have also been shown to impact predictions. For instance, models like gravity and quintessence alter the luminosity distance-redshift relation, potentially offering insights into alternative explanations for cosmic acceleration [35], [36].
Angular Diameter Distance
The angular diameter distance, is a key concept in observational cosmology, describing how the apparent size of an object relates to its actual physical size across cosmic distances. It is mathematically defined by:
where is the true physical size of the object and is the angle it subtends on the sky. In an expanding universe, however, the angular diameter distance behaves differently from what we intuitively expect on smaller scales. Due to the curvature of space and the expansion of the universe, increases with distance up to a certain redshift and then begins to decrease, meaning that objects at higher redshifts appear larger than one might expect [14], [15].
This phenomenon is a direct consequence of the universe’s geometry and expansion history, providing insights into the structure and fate of the universe. Observations of galaxy clusters and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) have utilized this property to measure the universe’s geometry and expansion rate, making crucial in cosmological studies [18], [21]. Additionally, as large surveys like the Dark Energy Survey and others continue to refine measurements of , they help constrain dark energy models by providing an accurate picture of cosmic expansion and structure over time [22].
Comoving Distance
The comoving distance is a fundamental concept in cosmology used to measure the separation between two points while accounting for the expansion of the universe. Unlike physical distance, which changes over time as the universe expands, comoving distance remains constant for any given pair of points. This property makes it especially useful for analyzing the large-scale structure of the universe, as it allows cosmologists to describe the spatial distribution of galaxies, clusters, and other cosmic structures without needing to account for the dynamics of expansion over time.
In practice, comoving distance is calculated by integrating over the rate of expansion, described by the scale factor in the Friedmann equations [14], [15], [37]. This measure allows astronomers to map the universe’s geometry and evolution more accurately and has been crucial in studies involving the cosmic microwave background (CMB), galaxy redshift surveys, and large-scale structure analyses [18], [22]. Comoving distance thus provides a consistent framework for understanding and interpreting distances over cosmological timescales unaffected by the universe’s continuous expansion.
Applications in Modern Cosmology
Redshift Surveys
Redshift surveys, particularly the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, have been groundbreaking in our understanding of the universe’s large-scale structure. These comprehensive surveys have mapped the positions and redshifts of millions of galaxies, effectively creating a three-dimensional representation of the cosmos. By measuring redshifts, astronomers can determine the velocities at which these galaxies are receding from us, thereby inferring their distances based on Hubble’s Law.
The data from these surveys have illuminated the complex architecture of the universe, revealing important features such as galaxy clusters, which are groups of galaxies bound together by gravity, as well as cosmic voids—large, relatively empty spaces between these clusters. Additionally, they have identified cosmic filaments, which are the vast, thread-like structures that connect clusters and expose the large-scale web of galaxies. This cosmic web structure has significant implications for our understanding of dark matter and dark energy, both of which play critical roles in the universe’s evolution [38], [39].
Furthermore, the SDSS and 2dF surveys have facilitated the study of galaxy formation and evolution by providing a rich dataset for statistical analyses. They allow researchers to test models of structure formation, investigate galaxy clustering, and explore the effects of cosmic evolution over billions of years [40]. Overall, these surveys represent a monumental achievement in cosmology, enabling a deeper understanding of the fundamental properties and dynamics of the universe.
Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
The discovery of the universe’s accelerating expansion in the late 1990s, led by observations of Type Ia supernovae, marked a pivotal moment in cosmology. This unexpected acceleration indicated that not only is the universe expanding but that the rate of expansion is increasing over time. This phenomenon is attributed to dark energy, a poorly understood form of energy that permeates space and constitutes about 70% of the universe’s total energy density [6], [7].
The presence of dark energy affects the redshift-distance relation, as it influences the universe’s expansion history, altering the observed brightness and redshift of distant objects. Observations of Type Ia supernovae, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), and large-scale structure have all been instrumental in refining this redshift-distance relationship and improving our understanding of dark energy’s impact on cosmic dynamics [18], [22]. Modern cosmological studies leverage this relationship to constrain dark energy’s properties and assess its possible evolution over time, which remains one of the central challenges in understanding the fate of the universe [41], [42].
Gravitational Waves and Redshift
In the era of multi-messenger astronomy, redshift measurements play a crucial role in the study of gravitational waves. The detection of gravitational waves from events like binary neutron star mergers, particularly those accompanied by electromagnetic counterparts (such as kilonovae or gamma-ray bursts), enables precise measurements of cosmic distances. By combining the redshift data from these electromagnetic counterparts with the gravitational wave signal, astronomers can measure cosmological parameters, such as the Hubble constant, and probe the expansion of the universe [43]–[45].
This approach provides an independent method for testing general relativity over cosmic distances. Redshifted signals from gravitational waves are less affected by traditional uncertainties found in electromagnetic observations, allowing for a novel means of studying cosmic expansion and refining distance scales in the universe. Multi-messenger detections thus bridge the gap between gravitational wave astrophysics and cosmology, further supporting constraints on models of dark energy and alternative theories of gravity [34], [46]–[49]. Observatories like LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA continue to contribute to this field, enhancing our understanding of both gravitational wave sources and the large-scale structure of the universe [50], [51].
Recent Advances and Future Prospects
Improving Redshift Precision
Recent advancements in observational astronomy have greatly enhanced the precision of redshift measurements, thanks to innovations in spectroscopic techniques and the integration of machine learning algorithms. Spectroscopic instruments, such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), are capable of obtaining redshift data for millions of galaxies with unprecedented accuracy, allowing for more detailed mapping of large-scale cosmic structures and improved constraints on cosmological parameters. DESI, which began its survey in 2021, aims to measure redshifts for over 35 million galaxies, dramatically expanding our understanding of dark energy and cosmic acceleration [52].
Upcoming missions like the Euclid satellite, scheduled to launch soon, are designed to work alongside DESI by providing redshift data across wide areas of the sky. Euclid will use near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy to study the distribution of galaxies over time, offering insights into dark matter and dark energy by precisely mapping the geometry of the universe [53]–[55]. Furthermore, the integration of machine learning algorithms has allowed for rapid and accurate classification of redshift data, improving data processing and analysis speed. These computational techniques help refine redshift estimates, particularly for faint or distant objects, where traditional methods might be challenging [56], [57].
These advancements provide essential tools for cosmological research, allowing astronomers to test theories of cosmic evolution and the fundamental physics governing the universe with higher precision than ever before.
Redshift in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Era
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has brought transformative advances to redshift studies, enabling astronomers to explore the early universe, galaxy formation, and the evolution of cosmic structures in unprecedented detail. Its sensitivity to infrared light allows it to detect faint, redshifted signals from extremely distant galaxies that optical telescopes like Hubble could not capture, allowing observations at redshifts of 15–20 and peering back to light emitted just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang [58], [59].
The spectroscopic capabilities of JWST, through instruments such as the Near Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) and Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI), allow precise redshift measurements by capturing emission and absorption lines for faint sources. This spectral data provides insights into galaxies’ chemical compositions and star formation rates across vast cosmic distances [60], [61]. The telescope’s reach extends into the epoch of reionization, the period when early galaxies and quasars began to ionize the intergalactic medium, helping astronomers map the ionizing processes that transformed the universe from opaque to transparent [62], [63].
JWST also offers critical data on dark matter and dark energy. By mapping galaxy distributions and redshifts, JWST informs models of cosmic structure growth, revealing how dark matter and dark energy have shaped the expansion of the universe [64]. In addition, JWST’s infrared capabilities are crucial in the search for Population III stars—the hypothesized first generation of stars composed only of primordial hydrogen and helium—potentially allowing astronomers to detect their unique spectral signatures for the first time [65].
These advancements in redshift research reshape our understanding of cosmic evolution. The findings from JWST are expected to challenge, refine, or confirm prevailing cosmological theories, yielding transformative insights into the universe’s composition, structure, and ultimate fate.
Conclusion
The study of redshift has become foundational to modern cosmology, providing essential insights into the structure, history, and dynamics of the universe. From distinguishing between Doppler and cosmological redshift to understanding relativistic redshift through the framework of the FLRW metric, these principles shape our knowledge of the expanding universe and support the Big Bang theory. Hubble’s groundbreaking observations established the proportionality between galactic recessional velocity and distance, a relationship refined over decades to form the basis for the Hubble-Lemaître law. Ongoing debates over the precise value of the Hubble constant, known as the “Hubble tension,” highlight unresolved complexities that continue to drive cosmological inquiry.
Cosmological distance measures, including luminosity distance, angular diameter distance, and comoving distance, allow us to interpret the universe’s large-scale structure and trace its expansion across time. Advances in redshift surveys, gravitational wave detections, and distance calculations through standard candles have not only mapped the universe but have also deepened our understanding of dark energy and cosmic acceleration. Today, redshift data from gravitational waves and multi-messenger astronomy offer new methods for refining distance measurements, providing robust tests for general relativity on cosmic scales.
With instruments like DESI, JWST, and future missions like Euclid, the precision of redshift measurements continues to advance, uncovering the early universe and tracing galaxy formation across epochs. JWST, in particular, extends our observational reach back to the universe’s first billion years, potentially revealing Population III stars and other primordial structures. Collectively, these tools and findings not only validate the theoretical models of cosmic evolution but also address fundamental questions about dark energy, dark matter, and the ultimate fate of the universe. As redshift studies continue to evolve, they will remain central to unlocking the mysteries of the cosmos, refining our cosmological models, and enhancing our understanding of the past, present, and future of the universe.
References
-
Hubble E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1929;15:168–73.
Google Scholar
1
-
Lemaître G. The expanding universe. Mon Not R Astron Soc 1931;91:490–501.
Google Scholar
2
-
Riess AG, Yuan W, Macri LM, Scolnic D, Brout D, Casertano S, et al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km s−1^{-1}−1 Mpc−1^{-1}−1 uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team. Astrophys J Lett 2022;934:L7.
Google Scholar
3
-
Alam S, Aubert M, Avila S, Balland C, Bautista JE, Bershady MA, et al. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys Rev D 2021;103:083533.
Google Scholar
4
-
Freedman WL, Madore BF. The Hubble Constant. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 2010;48:673–710.
Google Scholar
5
-
Riess AG, Filippenko AV, Challis P, Clocchiatti A, Diercks A, Garnavich PM, et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron J 1998;116:1009.
Google Scholar
6
-
Perlmutter S, Aldering G, Goldhaber G, Knop RA, Nugent P, Castro PG, et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae. Astrophys J 1999;517:565.
Google Scholar
7
-
Eisenstein DJ, Zehavi I, Hogg DW, Scoccimarro R, Blanton MR, Nichol RC, et al. Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies. Astrophys J 2005;633:560.
Google Scholar
8
-
Suyu SH, Bonvin V, Courbin F, Fassnacht CD, Rusu CE, Sluse D, et al. H0LiCOW–I. H 0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL’s Wellspring: program overview. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2017;468:2590–604.
Google Scholar
9
-
Freedman WL, Madore BF, Hoyt T, Jang IS, Beaton R, Lee MG, et al. Calibration of the tip of the red giant branch. Astrophys J 2020;891:57.
Google Scholar
10
-
Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, Acernese F, Ackley K, Adams C, et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys Rev Lett 2017;119:161101.
Google Scholar
11
-
Amendola L, Tsujikawa S. Dark energy: theory and observations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Google Scholar
12
-
Weinberg S. Cosmology. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 2008.
Google Scholar
13
-
Melia F. The Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric. Mod Phys Lett A 2022;37:2250016.
Google Scholar
14
-
Hartle JB. Gravity: an introduction to Einstein’s general relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
Google Scholar
15
-
Plebanski J, Krasinski A. An introduction to general relativity and cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2024.
Google Scholar
16
-
Di Valentino E, Anchordoqui LA, Akarsu Ö, Ali-Haimoud Y, Amendola L, Arendse N, et al. Snowmass2021-Letter of interest cosmology intertwined IV: The age of the universe and its curvature. Astropart Phys 2021;131:102607.
Google Scholar
17
-
Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Alves O, Amon A, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys Rev D 2022;105:023520.
Google Scholar
18
-
Slipher VM. Spectrographic observations of nebulae and star clusters. Pop Astr 1917;25:36.
Google Scholar
19
-
Uzakov OH, Rustam S. Origins of the universe: new, modern cosmological and astrophysical concepts. Br J Glob Ecol Sustain Dev 2024;26:1–11.
Google Scholar
20
-
Freedman WL. Measurements of the Hubble constant: tensions in perspective. Astrophys J 2021;919:16.
Google Scholar
21
-
Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, Aumont J, Baccigalupi C, Ballardini M, et al. Planck 2018 results-VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron Astrophys 2020;641:A6.
Google Scholar
22
-
Di Valentino E, Anchordoqui LA, Akarsu Ö, Ali-Haimoud Y, Amendola L, Arendse N, et al. Cosmology intertwined III: fσ8 and S8. Astropart Phys 2021;131:102604.
Google Scholar
23
-
Netchitailo VS. Hubble tension. J High Energy Phys Gravit Cosmol 2022;8:392–401.
Google Scholar
24
-
Cervantes-Cota JL, Galindo-Uribarri S, Smoot GF. The unsettled number: Hubble’s tension. Universe 2023;9:501.
Google Scholar
25
-
Di Valentino E, Mena O, Pan S, Visinelli L, Yang W, Melchiorri A, et al. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions. Class Quantum Gravity 2021;38:153001.
Google Scholar
26
-
Storti RC. The history of the cosmos: implications for the Hubble tension. Open Astron 2023;32:20220226.
Google Scholar
27
-
Brout D, Scolnic D, Popovic B, Riess AG, Carr A, Zuntz J, et al. The Pantheon+ analysis: cosmological constraints. Astrophys J 2022;938:110.
Google Scholar
28
-
De Jaeger T, Galbany L, González-Gaitán S, Kessler R, Filippenko AV, Förster F, et al. Studying Type II supernovae as cosmological standard candles using the Dark Energy Survey. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2020;495:4860–92.
Google Scholar
29
-
Dixon M. Exploring standard candle systematics across the rungs of the astronomical distance ladder [Internet]. Swinburne University; 2024. Available from: https://figshare.swinburne.edu.au/articles/thesis/Exploring_standard_candle_systematics_across_the_rungs_of_the_astronomical_distance_ladder/26391304
Google Scholar
30
-
Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Allen S, Annis J, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing. Phys Rev D 2020;102:023509.
Google Scholar
31
-
Brown SM. Using gravitational waves to study neutron stars in general relativity and alternative theories of gravity. 2023.
Google Scholar
32
-
Vasylyev SS, Filippenko AV. A measurement of the Hubble constant using gravitational waves from the binary merger GW190814. Astrophys J 2020;902:149.
Google Scholar
33
-
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration. A gravitational-wave measurement of the Hubble constant following the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo. Astrophys J 2021;909:1-18.
Google Scholar
34
-
Arora S. Late time acceleration with observational constraints in modified theories of gravity [Internet]. 2023. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00054
Google Scholar
35
-
Saridakis EN, Lazkoz R, Salzano V, Moniz PV, Capozziello S, Beltrán Jiménez J, et al., editors. Modified gravity and cosmology: an update by the CANTATA Network. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021.
Google Scholar
36
-
Langa M, Wamalwa DS, Mito C. Relativistic dynamics in a matter-dominated Friedmann universe. J Astrophys Astron 2017;38:1–11.
Google Scholar
37
-
Colless M, Dalton G, Maddox S, Sutherland W, Norberg P, Cole S, et al. The 2df galaxy redshift survey: spectra and redshifts. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2001;328:1039–63.
Google Scholar
38
-
Alam S, Ho S, Vargas-Magana M, Schneider DP. Testing general relativity with growth rate measurement from Sloan Digital Sky Survey–III. Baryon Oscillations Spectroscopic Survey galaxies. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2015;453:1754–67.
Google Scholar
39
-
Abazajian KN, Adelman-McCarthy JK, Agüeros MA, Allam SS, Prieto CA, An D, et al. The seventh data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys J Suppl Ser 2009;182:543.
Google Scholar
40
-
Shiu G, Tonioni F, Tran HV. Accelerating universe at the end of time. Phys Rev D 2023;108:063527.
Google Scholar
41
-
Kamionkowski M, Riess AG. The Hubble tension and early dark energy. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 2023;73:153–80.
Google Scholar
42
-
Borghi N, Mancarella M, Moresco M, Tagliazucchi M, Iacovelli F, Cimatti A, et al. Cosmology and astrophysics with standard sirens and galaxy catalogs in view of future gravitational wave observations. Astrophys J 2024;964:191.
Google Scholar
43
-
Mastrogiovanni S, Karathanasis C, Gair J, Ashton G, Rinaldi S, Huang HY, et al. Cosmology with gravitational waves: a review. Ann Phys 2024;536:2200180.
Google Scholar
44
-
Higashino Y, Tsujikawa S. Inspiral gravitational waveforms from compact binary systems in Horndeski gravity. Phys Rev D 2023;107:044003.
Google Scholar
45
-
Branchesi M. Multi-messenger astronomy. In: Bruno Touschek 100 Years: Memorial Symposium 2021. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 255–66.
Google Scholar
46
-
Piórkowska-Kurpas A. Graviton mass in the era of multi-messenger astronomy. Universe 2022;8:83.
Google Scholar
47
-
Trott E, Huterer D. Challenges for the statistical gravitational-wave method to measure the Hubble constant. Phys Dark Universe 2023;40:101208.
Google Scholar
48
-
Palmese A, Devicente J, Pereira MES, Annis J, Hartley W, Herner K, et al. A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy Survey galaxies. Astrophys J Lett 2020;900:L33.
Google Scholar
49
-
Shah VG, Narayan G, Perkins HM, Foley RJ, Chatterjee D, Cousins B, et al. Predictions for electromagnetic counterparts to neutron star mergers discovered during LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing runs 4 and 5. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2024;528:1109–24.
Google Scholar
50
-
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration, Abbott R, Abe H, Acernese F, et al. Open data from the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA and GEO. 2023. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03676
Google Scholar
51
-
Abareshi B, Aguilar J, Ahlen S, Alam S, Alexander DM, Alfarsy R, et al. Overview of the instrumentation for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument. Astron J 2022;164:207.
Google Scholar
52
-
Atek H, Gavazzi R, Weaver JR, Diego JM, Schrabback T, Hatch NA, et al. Euclid: Early release observations—a preview of the Euclid era through a galaxy cluster magnifying lens. 2024. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13504
Google Scholar
53
-
Balbinot E, Balcells M, Beaulieu J-P, Belikov AN, Bisigello L, Branchini E, et al. Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. 2024.
Google Scholar
54
-
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier Y, Acevedo Barroso JA, Achúcarro A, Adamek J, Adam R, et al. Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. Astron Astrophys 2024;Arxiv.
Google Scholar
55
-
Newman JA, Gruen D. Photometric redshifts for next-generation surveys. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 2022;60:363–414.
Google Scholar
56
-
Cagliari MS. Novel methods to extract cosmological information from galaxy redshift surveys. 2024.
Google Scholar
57
-
Muñoz JB, Mirocha J, Chisholm J, Furlanetto SR, Mason C. Reionization after JWST: a photon budget crisis? Mon Not R Astron Soc Lett 2024;535:L37–L43.
Google Scholar
58
-
Roberts-Borsani G, Treu T, Chen W, Morishita T, Vanzella E, Zitrin A, et al. The nature of an ultra-faint galaxy in the cosmic dark ages seen with JWST. Nature 2023;618:480–3.
Google Scholar
59
-
Schaerer D, Marques-Chaves R, Barrufet L, Oesch P, Izotov YI, Naidu R, et al. First look with JWST spectroscopy: resemblance among z 8 galaxies and local analogs. Astron Astrophys 2022;665:L4.
Google Scholar
60
-
Carniani S, Hainline K, D’Eugenio F, Eisenstein DJ, Jakobsen P, Witstok J, et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14. Nature 2024;633:318–22.
Google Scholar
61
-
Endsley R, Stark DP, Whitler L, Topping MW, Chen Z, Plat A, et al. A JWST/NIRCam study of key contributors to reionization: the star-forming and ionizing properties of UV-faint z 7–8 galaxies. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2023;524:2312–30.
Google Scholar
62
-
Chávez R, Terlevich R, Terlevich E, González-Morán A, Fernández-Arenas D, Bresolin F, et al. Reconstructing cosmic history: JWST-extended mapping of the Hubble flow from z ∼ 0 to z ∼ 7.5 with HII galaxies. 2024. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16261
Google Scholar
63
-
Menci N, Castellano M, Santini P, Merlin E, Fontana A, Shankar F. High-redshift galaxies from early JWST observations: constraints on dark energy models. Astrophys J Lett 2022;938:L5.
Google Scholar
64
-
Trussler JA, Conselice CJ, Adams NJ, Maiolino R, Nakajima K, Zackrisson E, et al. On the observability and identification of Population III galaxies with JWST. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2023;525:5328–52.
Google Scholar
65