The Descartes Code (Spin Orbital Rotation of Photons)–III. The Cosmological Redshift and the Hubble Constant
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
A new alternative model to the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric is presented based on Descartes’ code—the old color theory published in 1637. In this model, the photon spin-orbital speed is slowly decreasing in the free space of the Universe. The formulae for the wavelength, frequency, local time, momentum, energy, temperature, and photon energy dilation are presented for cosmological photons outside of a gravitational field. The Hubble constant H⊕ = 2.3195 ∗ 10−18 s−1 (= 71.572 kms−1Mpc−1) is calculated as (G M⊕)/(R⊕ c3) ∗ dcrotational/dt where G is the Newtonian gravitation constant, M⊕ is the Earth’s mass, R⊕ is the Earth’s radius, and crotational is the rotational speed of Descartes’ light “globules” without any fitting. The cosmological photons expand their wavelength in the Earth’s gravitational field based on the age of those photons determined via their redshift given as (1 + z). This newly defined Hubble constant can be falsified in the gravitational field of the Moon, and Mars. The simple formulae for the angular diameter distance dA, the luminosity distance dL, the distance modulus m—M, the concentration of galaxies at the redshift z can be tested on the recent data. E.g., the distance modulus was several times tested on the cosmological objects till their redshift z = 5 (references to those studies are given). The formula for the angular diameter distance dA was recently tested for the data taken using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) by Lovyagin et al. and the value of dA followed the data trend better than the standard model. This Descartes’ hypothesis can start a discussion of Descartes’ cosmological photons can newly explain experimental data without fitting in Euclidean space.
Introduction
Einstein’s theory of gravity is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and is the current description of gravitation in modern physics [1]. Einstein used approximation methods in working out initial predictions of his theory. The exact solution of the Einstein field equations of general relativity was developed independently by Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW metric) in the 1920s and 1930s. This model is sometimes called the Standard model of modern cosmology, e.g. [2].
This FLRW metric leads to quantitative predictions that were very intensively experimentally tested with impressive accuracy [3], however, fitting of data is necessary based on an unknown dark energy and on an unknown dark matter. Since that time there were published many attempts as alternative scenarios to the original Einstein’s theory of gravity [4] in order to avoid the fitting data based on that unknown dark energy and dark matter. None of these proposals can compete with predictions of the original Einstein’s theory. There was one alternative proposal by Zwicky in 1929 known as the “tired light” scenario [5]. Since that time there were proposed about 60 ad hoc modifications of this model [6] but none was accepted because this model could not interpret all experimental data found for the cosmological photons.
Therefore, it seems almost impossible to appear with an alternative model describing the influence of the gravitational field on cosmological photon properties in the Euclidean space. This contribution brings to the focus an old, forgotten and overlooked theory of colors that might newly quantitatively describe the photon colors—the gravitational redshift of cosmological photons in the gravitational field of an observer.
The Expansion of the Cosmological Photons in the Gravitational Fields of Earth, Moon, and Mars
In this model, the cosmological photons interact with the gravitational field of the Earth [7] and their wavelength expands in the dependence of their age expressed via their redshift. This model can be falsified by the performing of this experiment in the gravitational fields of the Moon, and Mars. This experiment could be very valuable for the estimation of the reality of Descartes’ code. The project ICURE (India, China, United States of America, Russia, and European Union) could bring new data for the properties of cosmological photons in the gravitational field of the Earth, Moon, and Mars. The characteristic expansion parameters for those gravitational fields termed as the Hubble constant are given in Table I. These gravitational fields modify the spin-orbital rotation speed of cosmological photons cROT and the characteristic redshift z is measured by the Hubble telescopes located close to the surface of those objects.
Earth | Moon | Mars | |
---|---|---|---|
Mass [kg] | 5.9722*1024 | 7.342*1022 | 6.4171*1023 |
Radius [km] | 6378.137 | 1737.4 | 3389.5 |
Gravitational effect on the rotational speed of old photons | |||
Expansion parameter of the gravitational field [s−1] | 2.3195*10−18 | 1.0468*10−19 | 4.6897*10−19 |
Expansion parameter of the gravitational field[kms−1Mpc−1] | 71.572 | 3.230 | 14.471 |
Expansion parameter for cosmological photons |
In the last decades many scholars experimentally determined the value of the Hubble constant, some reviews analyzed the so-called Hubble tension, e.g. [8]–[12]. Wang et al. [13] statistically analyzed 216 measurements of the Hubble constant during the period 2012–2022. We have made a simple arithmetic average of those 216 measurements organized in the histogram in Fig. 1.
The actual state of the art offers many procedures how to evaluate the present value of the Hubble constant H0. The analysis is very complicated and it is difficult to select the technique leading to the true value of H0. The simple arithmetic average of those 216 measurements gives the value H0 = (70.99 ± 3.17) kms−1Mpc−1. The effect of the Earth’s gravitational field on the expansion of the cosmological photons gives the value H⊕ = 2.3195*10−18 s−1 (= 71.572 kms−1Mpc−1). In this scenario, there is no fitting parameter to get the value of the Hubble constant. The value H⊕ is determined from the Earth’s mass and radius, the Newtonian gravitational constant G, and the light speed c.
The Descartes Code: Expansion Data from Cosmic Chronometers
The very old (1637) Descartes’ color theory [14] based on the rotation of “light globules” can be the “lost key” on how to crack the mysterious behavior of cosmological photons. This Descartes’ color theory was rejected by Newton in 1672 and was forgotten and overlooked in the coming centuries [15]–[25]. During the last year there were several important contributions for the description of color in physics that were newly re-interpreted based on the Descartes color theory, [26]–[28]. The recent strong growing interest in the Spin Angular Momentum (SAM) and the Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) of photons brings many new experimental data, e.g. [29]–[36]. It could be very interesting to study the rotation of cosmological photons in the gravitational field as well.
Descartes’ model is based on the idea that cosmological photons expand their wavelength in the gravitational field of an observer. This wavelength expansion of cosmological photons increases with their age and with the gravitational field intensity at the observer site. This model can be tested on experimental data from cosmic chronometers published by authors given in Table II. The data in Table II represent the standard set for the analysis of behavior of cosmological photons based on the cosmic chronometers.
Redshift z | H(z) km s−1 Mpc−1 | Reference |
---|---|---|
0.07 | 69.0 ± 19.6 | Zhang et al. [37] |
0.09 | 69.0 ± 12.0 | Jimenez et al. [38] |
0.12 | 68.6 ± 26.2 | Zhang et al. [37] |
0.17 | 83.0 ± 8.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
0.179 | 75.0 ± 4.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.199 | 75.0 ± 5.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.2 | 72.9 ± 29.6 | Zhang et al. [37] |
0.27 | 77.0 ± 14.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
0.28 | 88.8 ± 36.6 | Zhang et al. [37] |
0.352 | 83.0 ± 14.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.38 | 83.0 ± 13.5 | Moresco et al. [41] |
0.4 | 95.0 ± 17.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
0.4 | 77.0 ± 10.2 | Moresco et al. [41] |
0.425 | 87.1 ± 11.2 | Moresco et al. [41] |
0.45 | 92.8 ± 12.9 | Moresco et al. [41] |
0.47 | 89.0 ± 34.0 | Ratsimbazafy et al. [42] |
0.478 | 80.9 ± 9.0 | Moresco et al. [41] |
0.48 | 97.0 ± 62.0 | Stern et al. [43] |
0.593 | 104.0 ± 13.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.68 | 92.0 ± 8.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.75 | 98.8 ± 33.6 | Borghi et al. [44] |
0.781 | 105.0 ± 12.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.8 | 113.1 ± 28.5 | Jiao et al. [45] |
0.875 | 125.0 ± 17.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
0.88 | 90.0 ± 40.0 | Stern et al. [43] |
0.9 | 117.0 ± 23.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
1.037 | 154.0 ± 20.0 | Moresco et al. [40] |
1.3 | 168.0 ± 17.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
1.363 | 160.0 ± 33.6 | Moresco [46] |
1.43 | 177.0 ± 18.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
1.53 | 140.0 ± 14.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
1.75 | 202.0 ± 40.0 | Simon et al. [39] |
1.965 | 186.5 ± 50.4 | Moresco [46] |
Fig. 2 shows the dependence of the expansion of cosmological photons in the gravitational field of the Earth. The value H⊕ is determined from the Earth’s mass and radius, the Newtonian gravitational constant G, and the light speed c. The value of the redshift can be extracted from the measured spectra with a very good accuracy. The red line in Fig. 2 allows no fitting of data.
The Descartes Code and the Properties of the Cosmological Photons in the Free Space
The Descartes’ code describes newly the properties of cosmological photons far from the gravitational fields of planets, stars and galaxies on their long journey through the free space to an observer—Table III.
Descartes’code—cosmological photon properties in the free space |
---|
It was discovered that the light curves of distant supernovae of type Ia were stretched in proportion to the redshift factor (1 + z), e.g. [47]–[53]. This effect is interpreted here as the local time of cosmological photons that stretched the width of observed light curves. The Tolman test and the prediction (1 + z)−4 of the surface brightness decrease with the fourth power of (1 + z) is explained as the result of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, e.g. [54],[55].
The Descartes Code and the Cosmological Photons in the Earth’s Gravitational Field
Descartes’ code describes newly the properties of cosmological photons in the gravitational field of the Earth. From Zwicky’s formula, we can determine the angular diameter distance dA. From the photon energy dilation and the angular diameter distance we can determine the luminosity distance dL. Table IV summarizes formulae important for the description of cosmological events.
Angular diameter distance dA |
---|
Luminosity distance dL |
Distance modulus m–M |
Number of galaxies in the volume with radius dA |
Number of galaxies at z |
Formulae in Table IV were derived without any fitting and postulating some additional phenomena as e.g. the dark energy or the dark matter. These formulae can be tested on valuable experimental data taken recently by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and compare with the standard cosmological model predictions. Lovyagin et al. [56] tested the formula of the angular diameter distance derived from the Zwicky model together with some traditional formulae and found a very interesting tendency of the Zwicky formula to follow the experimental data better than the traditional cosmological models. Gupta [57] used the Lovyagin et al. data [56] and added to this analysis several cosmological models with fitting of data—“hybrid expansion models.” Fig. 3 is reprinted from the Gupta [57] paper with his fitted “hybrid models” together with Lovyagin et al. [56] curves for the tired light prediction and the ΛCDM model.
If we replace the rejected Zwicky’s interpretation of the “tired light” by the Descartes’ rotating “light globules” we can introduce the “wavelength expansion” of cosmological photons in the Earth’s gravitational field without any fitting of data. The future analysis of the JWST data can clarify the reality of the Descartes’ model.
The Distance Modulus Formula without Fitting of Data
The distance modulus formula was derived without fitting data by several independent scholars. This formula was tested on many sets of redshifted objects till the redshift z = 5. In our model we have calculated the Hubble constant for the Earth’s gravitational field as H⊕ = 2.3195*10−18 s−1 (= 71.572 kms−1Mpc−1). Therefore, this version of the distance modulus is without any fitting. Table V gives brief information about those activities with references to the original papers with those analyses. It will be interesting to test the recent data from JWST with this formula.
The expanding spacetime theory | Masreliez | [58] |
Machian general relativity | Booth | [59] |
Static Universe | Ostermann | [60] |
Geometrical interpretation of “c” | Vigoureux et al. | [61] |
Tired light hypothesis | Sorrell | [62] |
Tenable cosmology | Traunműller | [63] |
Exponential tired light | Marosi | [64] |
Conclusion
This contribution is based on the old, forgotten, and rejected Descartes’ color theory based on the spin orbital rotation of “light globules”. This Descartes’ model of cosmological photon spinning in the gravitational fields leads to simple but powerful formulae. Cosmological photons in the gravitational fields expand their wavelength—the age of photons increases this expansion, the growing intensity of the gravitational field at the observer site increases this expansion, too.
- The Descartes’ model of rotating light “globules” (based on the spin-orbital rotation of photons) was selected as the potential candidate to interpret newly effects of the gravitational fields on cosmological photons.
- The basic properties of cosmological photons (wavelength, frequency, local time, momentum, energy, photon energy dilation) were defined.
- The value of the Hubble constant for the Earth’s gravitational field was calculated without fitting as H⊕ = 2.3195*10−18 s−1 (= 71.572 kms−1Mpc−1). The value H⊕ is determined from the Earth’s mass and radius, the Newtonian gravitational constant G, and the light speed c. We can term this constant as the “geocentric” Hubble constant.
- The standard set of redshift data from the cosmic chronometers was used to document the expansion of cosmological photons in the Earth’s gravitational field.
- The simple formulae for the angular diameter distance, the luminosity distance, the distance modulus, the number of galaxies at the redshift z can be tested on numerous available data.
- The formula for the distance modulus without any fitting was derived.
- The angular diameter distance formula derived from Zwicky’s model follows the trend in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data better than the traditional cosmological models based on the expansion of the Universe (based on Lovyagin et al. [56] and Gupta [57]).
References
-
Einstein A. Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. (On the Special and General Theory of Relativity). Braunschweig, Vieweg Publisher, German, 1917.
Google Scholar
1
-
Bergstöm L, Goobar A. Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics. Springer Verlag Berlin; 2004, ISBN 3-540-32924-2
Google Scholar
2
-
Will CM. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. ISBN 978-1-107-11744-0
Google Scholar
3
-
Alternatives to general relativity. Wikipedia. 2023. Accessed on December 12. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_general_relativity.
Google Scholar
4
-
Zwicky F. On the redshift of spectral lines through interstellar space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1929;15(10):773–9.
Google Scholar
5
-
Marmet L. On the interpretation of spectral red-shift in astrophysics: a survey of red-shift mechanisms—II. Arxiv: 1801.07582v1. 2018. Accessed on January 07, 2024.
Google Scholar
6
-
Stávek J. The Descartes’ code (spin orbital rotation of photons). II. The gravitational redshift. Eur J Appl Phys. 2024;6(1):14–23.
Google Scholar
7
-
Di Valentino E, Mena O, Pan S, Visinelli L, Yang W, Melchiorri A, et al. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions. Classical Quant Grav. 2021;38(15):id. 153001.
Google Scholar
8
-
Perivolaropoulos L, Skara F. Challenges for CDM: an update. New Astron Rev. 2022;95:id. 101659.
Google Scholar
9
-
Abdalla E, Abellán GF, Aboubrahim A, Agnello A, Akarsu O, Akrami YA, et al. Cosmology intertwined: a review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies.J High Energy Astrophys. 2022;34:49–211.
Google Scholar
10
-
Hu JP, Wang FY. Hubble tension: the evidence of new physics. Universe. 2023;9(2):id. 94.
Google Scholar
11
-
Vagnozzi S. Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension. Universe. 2023;9(9):393.
Google Scholar
12
-
Wang B, López-Corredoira M, Wei JJ. The Hubble tension surveys: a statistical analysis of the 2012–2022 measurements. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2024;527:7692–7700.
Google Scholar
13
-
Descartes R, Oevres de Descartes. Les Meteors. Adam Ch, Tannery P. Discours 8. Paris, French. 1897–1910. pp. 331–5.
Google Scholar
14
-
Rosenfeld L. La theorie des couleurs de Newton et ses adversaires. (The color theory of Newton and his contemporaries). Isis. 1927;9(1):44–65, French.
Google Scholar
15
-
Westfall RS. The development of Newton’s theory of color. Isis. 1962;53(3):339–58.
Google Scholar
16
-
Westfall RS. Newton and his critics on the nature of colors. Archives International d´Histoire des Sciences. 1962;15:47–52.
Google Scholar
17
-
Sabra AI. Theories of light from Descartes to Newton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Google Scholar
18
-
Shapiro AE. Newton’s definition of a light ray and the diffusion theories of chromatic dispersion. Isis. 1975;66(2):194–220.
Google Scholar
19
-
Nakajima H. Two kinds of modification theory of light: some new observations on the Newton-Hooke controversy of 1672 concerning the nature of light. Ann Sci. 1984;41(3):261–78.
Google Scholar
20
-
Guerlac H. Can there be colors in the dark? Physical color theory before Newton. J History Ideas. 1986;47(1):3–20.
Google Scholar
21
-
Steinle F. Newton’s rejection of the modification theory of colour. In Hegel and the Sciences. Cohen RS,Wartofsky MW; 64. Dordrecht, Boston, Hingham, MA: D. Reidel, 1994. pp. 547–56.
Google Scholar
22
-
Zemplén G. Newton’s rejection of the modificationist tradition. Form, Zahl. Ordnung: studien zur Wissenschafts-und Technikgeschichte: ivo Schneider zum 65. Geburtstag. 2004;48:481–503.
Google Scholar
23
-
Garben MD. Chymical wonders of light: J. Marcus Marci’s seventeenth-century Bohemian optics. Early Sci Med. 2005;10(4):478–509.
Google Scholar
24
-
Zemplén GA. The history of vision, colour, & light theories: introductions, texts, problems. In Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Bern Publisher, Bern, 2005.
Google Scholar
25
-
Stávek J. A new interpretation of the physical color theory based on the Descartes’ rotation energy of visible, ultraviolet, and infrared photons. Eur J Appl Phys. 2023;5(5):29–38.
Google Scholar
26
-
Stávek J. The element of physical reality hidden in the letter of Malus to Lancret in 1800 can solve the EPR paradox (Malus thermochromatic loophole). Eur J Appl Phys. 2023;5(6):10–6.
Google Scholar
27
-
Stávek J. TheDescartes code (spin orbital rotation of photons). I. The fourth-order effects in the Michelson interferometer. Eur J Appl Phys. 2023;5(6):25–30.
Google Scholar
28
-
Garetz BA. Angular Doppler effect. J Opt Soc Am. 1980;71:609–11.
Google Scholar
29
-
Dholakia K. An experiment to demonstrate the angular Doppler effect on laser light. Am J Phys. 1998;66:1007–10.
Google Scholar
30
-
Yao AM, Padgett MJ. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv Opt Photonics. 2011;3(2): 161–204.
Google Scholar
31
-
Zhou H, Fu D, Dong J, Zhang P, Zhang X. Theoretical analysis and experimental verification on optical rotational Doppler effect. Opt Express. 2016;24(9):10053.
Google Scholar
32
-
Li G, Zentgraf T, Zhang S. Rotational Doppler effect in nonlinear optics. Nat Phys. 2016;12:736–41.
Google Scholar
33
-
Pan D, Xu H, García de Abajo FJ. Rotational Doppler cooling and heating. Science Advances. 2021;7(2):ea6705.
Google Scholar
34
-
Shen Y, Wang X, Xie Z, Min C, Fu X, Liu Q, et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological chargé to multiple singularities. Light: Sci Appl. 2019;8(1):90.
Google Scholar
35
-
Emile O, Emile J. Rotational Doppler effect: a review. Ann Phys-BERLIN. 2023;535(1):2300250.
Google Scholar
36
-
Zhang C, Zhang H, Yuan S, Liu S, Zhang TJ, Sun YC. Four new observational H(z) data from luminous red galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey data release seven. Res Astron Astrophys. 2014;14(10):1221.
Google Scholar
37
-
Jimenez R, Verde L, Treu T, Stern D. Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the cosmic microwave background. The Astrophys J. 2003;593(2):622.
Google Scholar
38
-
Simon J, Verde L, Jimenez R. Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential. Phys Rev D. 2005;71(12):123001.
Google Scholar
39
-
Moresco M, Cimatti A, Jimenez R, Pozetti L, Zamorani G, Bolzonella M, et al. Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z ∼ 1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. 2012;2012(08):006.
Google Scholar
40
-
Moresco M, Pozzetti L, Cimatti A, Jimenez R, Maraston C, Verde L, et al. A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at z ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. 2016;2016(05):014.
Google Scholar
41
-
Ratsimbasafy A, Loubser SI, Crawford SM, Cress CM, Bassett BA, Nichol RC, et al. Age-dating luminous red galaxies observed with the Southern African large telescope. Mon Notices Royal Astron Soc. 2017;467(3):3239–54.
Google Scholar
42
-
Stern D, Jimenez R, Verde L, Kamionkowski M, Stanford SA. Cosmic chronometers: constraining the equation of state of dark energy. I: H(z) measurements. J Cosmol Astropart Phys. 2010;2010(02):008.
Google Scholar
43
-
Borghi N, Moresco M, Cimatti A. Toward a better understanding of cosmic chronometers: a new measurement of H(z) at z ∼ 0.7. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2022;928(1):L4.
Google Scholar
44
-
Jiao K, Borghi N, Moresco M, Zhang TJ. New observational H(z) data from full-spectrum fitting of cosmic chronometers in the LEGA-C survey. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2023;265(2):48.
Google Scholar
45
-
Moresco M. Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z ∼ 2. Mon Notices Royal Astrophys Soc: Lett. 2015;450(1):L16–L20.
Google Scholar
46
-
Leibundgut B, Schommer R, Phillips M, Riess A, Schmidt B, Spyromilio J, et al. Time dilation in the light curve of the distant type Ia supernova SN 1995K. The Astrophysical Journal. 1996;1:L21.
Google Scholar
47
-
Riess AG, Filippenko AV, Leonard D, Schmidt BP, Suntzeff N, Phillips MM, et al. Time dilation from spectral feature age measurements of type Ia supernovae. The Astronomical Journal. 1997;114:722–9.
Google Scholar
48
-
Filippenko AV, Riess AG. Results from the high-z supernova search team. Phys Rep. 1998;307(1–4):31–44.
Google Scholar
49
-
Perlmutter S, Aldering G, Valle MD, Deustua S, Ellis RS, Fabbro S, et al. Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the Universe. Nature. 1998;391:51–4.
Google Scholar
50
-
Goldhaber G, Groom DE, Kim A, Aldering G, Astier P, Conley A, et al. Timescale stretch parameterization of type Ia supernova B-band light curves. The Astrophysical Journal. 2001;558:359–68.
Google Scholar
51
-
Foley RJ, Fillipenko AV, Leonard DC, Riess AG, Nugent P, Perlmutter S. A definitive measurement of time dilation in the spectral evolution of the moderate-redshift type Ia supernova 1997ex. The Astrophysical Journal. 2005;626:L11–L14.
Google Scholar
52
-
Blondin S, Davis TM, Krisciunas K, Schmidt BP, Son J, Wood-Vasey WM, et al. Time dilation in type Ia supernova spectra at high redshift. The Astrophysical Journal. 2008;682:724.
Google Scholar
53
-
Pahre MA, Djorgovski SG, Carvalho RR de. A Tolman surface brightness test for universal expansion and the evolution of elliptical galaxies in distant clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. 1996;456(2):L79.
Google Scholar
54
-
Sandage A, Lubin LM. The Tolman surface brightness test for the reality of the expansion. The Astrophysical Journal. 2001;121:2289–2300.
Google Scholar
55
-
Lovyagin N, Raikov A, Yershov V, Lovyagin Y. Cosmological model tests with JWST. Galaxies. 2022;10:108.
Google Scholar
56
-
Gupta RP. JWST early universe observations and CDM cosmology. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2023;524:3385–95.
Google Scholar
57
-
Masreliez CJ. The expanding spacetime theory. Astrophys Space Sci. 1999;266(3):399–447.
Google Scholar
58
-
Booth R. Machian general relativity: a possible solution to the dark energy problem, and a replacement for Big Bang cosmology. 2001. Arxiv: preprint gr-qc/0106007. Accessed on January 07 2024.
Google Scholar
59
-
Ostermann P. Ein stationäres Universum und die Grundlagen der Relativitätstheorie. 2002. Arxiv: preprint physics/0211054.pdf. Accessed on January 07, 2024.
Google Scholar
60
-
Vigoureux JM, Vigoureux P, Vigoureux B. Cosmological applications of a geometrical interpretation of c. Int J Theor Phys. 2008;47:928–35.
Google Scholar
61
-
Sorell WH. Misconceptions about the Hubble recession law. Astrophys Space Sci. 2009;323:205–11.
Google Scholar
62
-
Traunmüller H. From magnitudes and redshifts of supernovae, their light-curves, and angular sizes of galaxies to a tenable cosmology. Astrophys Space Sci. 2014;350:755–67.
Google Scholar
63
-
Marosi LA. Hubble diagram test of 280 supernovae redshift data. Journal of Modern Physics. 2014. id. 42255.
Google Scholar
64
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Jiří Stávek,
ChatGPT on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 5 No. 6 (2023) -
Jiří Stávek,
ChatGPT on the Gravitational Redshift , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) -
Jiří Stávek,
ChatGPT on the Cosmological Redshift and the Hubble Constant , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) -
Jiří Stávek,
The Newtonian Gravitational Constant G Interpreted as the Gravitational Inertia of Vacuum - G0. How to Arrange Twelve Precise Experimental Determinations of GZ in their Spread 500 ppm? , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) -
Jiří Stávek,
ChatGPT on the Mathematical Language in Physics , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 5 No. 6 (2023) -
Jiří Stávek,
Spin Interpreted as the Angular Momentum Curvature, Electron g-factor Interpreted as the Ratio of Toroidal Torsion and Curvature, Unlocking of the Fixed Planck Constant h – New Tests for Old Physics , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) -
Jiří Stávek,
A New Interpretation of Contributions Presented at the Solvay Conference 1911. Can We Falsify the “Geocentric” Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Solar System? , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 3 No. 6 (2021) -
Jiří Stávek,
The Rydberg Constant Interpreted as the Gaussian Curvature, Gauss-Bohr-de Broglie Model – Two Shadow Projections of the Helix, Unlocking of the Fixed Constant c of the Speed of Light – New Tests for Old Physics , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) -
Jiří Stávek,
A New Interpretation of the Physical Color Theory Based on the Descartes´ Rotation Energy of Visible, Ultraviolet and Infrared Photons , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 5 No. 5 (2023) -
Jiří Stávek,
How to Relieve the Hubble Constant Tension? (Earth´s Gravitational Redshift + Earth´s Diurnal Aberration) , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022)