##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

To introduce Soliton theory in magnetic recording systems, we begin with the profile of Domain Wall, which is key elements of recording systems, knowing that many different Domain Walls shape exist. For this, we consider the recording media as chain of atoms (spin) and, we use the Hamiltonian to describe the global state of the system; by taking into consideration interaction between the neighboring spin and anisotropic interaction. Spins are considered as classical vector; for that, we defined the cosine and sine of angles that specify the position of the spins. They are developed in Taylor’s series until second order then using the approximation of continuous medium we obtained the Lagragian relation. This Lagragian enables us to describe the dynamics of spin through the wave velocity. As we are fine just the profile of domain wall it is beneficial for us to consider the wall at rest (static) and by the aid of Euler equation we obtain two simple equations; using the equilibrium conditions, the differential equation is obtained and solved by the quadratic method and separation variables method. The profile of domain wall that we obtain is at a particular position, then analytical and numerical simulation give us the opportunity to see that profile of that domain wall is a Kink, anti-Kink Soliton and also Soliton Train. Using this magnetic Soliton wave (Domain Wall), we also evaluate the playback voltage V (x), the peak voltage and the half pulse width PW50 to confirm the uses of this DW profile in magnetic recording systems and insure validity of this work.

References

  1. Parkin S. S. P, Hayashi M., and L. Thomas, “Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory”, Science (New York, N.Y.), 320 (5873): 190-4, April 2008.
     Google Scholar
  2. Fukami S, Suzuki T, Nagahara K, Ohshima N, Ozaki Y, Saito S, Nebashi R, Sakimura N, Honjo H, Mori K, et al, “Low-current perpendicular domain wall motion cell for scalable high speed MRAM”, InSymposium on VLSI Technology, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  3. Steven lequeux, Déplacement de paroi de domaine par transfert de spin dans des jonctions tunnel magnétiques : application au memristor spintronique, Thèse de doctorat de l’université paris-Saclay, préparée a l’université paris-sud école doctorale n°564 physique en Île-de-France, spécialité: physique de la matière condensée, nanophysique, juin 2016.
     Google Scholar
  4. Chanthbouala A, Matsumoto R, Grollier J, Cros V, Anane A, Fert A, Khvalkovskiy A. V, Zvezdin K. A, Nishimura K, Nagamine Y, Maehara H, Tsunekawa K, Fukushima A, and Yuasa S, “Vertical-current-induced domain-wall motion in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions with low current densities,” Nature Physics, 7(8) :626-630, April 2011.
     Google Scholar
  5. Middelhoek S, “Domain Walls in Thin Ni [Single Bond] Fe Films,” Journal of Applied Physics, 34, (4), 1054, June (1963).
     Google Scholar
  6. NEEL M. L, “Parois dans les films minces,” Le Journal de Physique Colloque, 29(C2): C2-87-C2-94, February (1968).
     Google Scholar
  7. Thiaville A. and Nakatani Y, “Domain-Wall Dynamics in Nanowires and Nanostrips,” Spin dynamics in confined magnetic structures III, 2006. URL http://link.springer.com/chapter/ 10.1007/10938171_5.
     Google Scholar
  8. MasanoriK, “Historical Development of Magnetic Recording and Tape Recorder,” National Museum of Nature and Science Survey Reports on the Systemization of Technologies, vol.17, pp. 185-275, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kanellos M, “A divide over the future of hard drives,” CNETNews.com, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  10. Robert H. Kraus, “the overview and history of permanent magnet
     Google Scholar
  11. devices in accelerator technology” Submitted to Thirteenth international conference on magnet technology, Victoria conference centre. Victoria, B. C. CANADA, September 20-24, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  12. Miles J.J and Middleton B.K, “An analysis for the magnetization mode for high density magnetic recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-23, N°5, pp.2070-2072, 1987.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hoagland A. S. and Monson J. E, Digital magnetic recording, Editor: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2nd Revised edition (14 June 1991), PP 248. ISBN-10: 0471401447; ISBN-13: 978-0471401445.
     Google Scholar
  14. Smith D, Chunsheng E, Khizroev S, and Litvinov D, “The Influence of Bit Patterned Medium Design and Imperfections on Magnetoresistive Playback,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 2285, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  15. Bertram H. N, Theory of magnetic recording, Cambridge, University Press; 1994 PP 121.
     Google Scholar
  16. Middleton B. K, Recording and reproducing processes2nd Ed C.D. Mee, E.D. Daniel (Eds.), Magnetic Recording Handbook; 1996, Chap.3, pp. 82.
     Google Scholar
  17. IBM, “OEM MR Head Technology The erea of giant magnetoresistive heads,” Hitachigst.com, Archived from the Retrieved 4 September 2010.
     Google Scholar
  18. Varvaco G and Casoli F,” Ultrahigh density magnetic recording: Storage Materials and Media Designs,” Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd;2016, pp. 457.
     Google Scholar
  19. H. N. Bertram, Theory of magnetic recording, Book in Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp 100.
     Google Scholar
  20. B. K. Middleton, Recording and reproducing processes, C. D. Mee, E. D. Daniel (Eds.), Magnetic Recording Handbook 2nd Ed, 1996, Chap. 2, pp. 30 and Chap. 3, pp. 87.
     Google Scholar
  21. Freiser M. J, “On the zigzag form of charged domain walls,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 23, pp. 330–338, May 1979.
     Google Scholar
  22. Muller M. and Murdock E, “Williams–Comstock type model for sawtooth transitions in thin film media,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 23, pp. 2368–2370, Sept. 1987.
     Google Scholar
  23. Minnaja N. and Nobile M, “Stability conditions for saw-tooth walls between head-on domains,” AIP Conf. Proc. 10, 1001-5, 1972.
     Google Scholar
  24. Semenov V, Factorivich A. and Gikas M, “The effect of coercive squareness S* on transition noise in thin metal media,” Proc. Jap. Mag. Society of Japan 15 (S2), 251-6, 1991.
     Google Scholar
  25. Parkin S. S. P, Hayashi M and Thomas L, “Magnetic Domain-Wall Racetrack Memory,”Science, vol.320, pp. 190, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  26. Mallinson J. C, “On extremely high density digital recording,” IEEE Transaction on Magnetics Mag, vol. 10, No.2, 1974.
     Google Scholar
  27. Murali K. H, “Time resolved domain wall motion in novel spin transfer torque devices,”PhD thesis, Department of Physic, University of Bath, Bath, UK, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  28. Hozoi A, “Edge effects and submicron track in magnetic tape recording,”PhD thesis, University of Twente, Romania, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  29. Thiaville A, Rohart S, Jué E, Cros V and Fert A, “Dynamics of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin magnetic films,” Europhysics Lett, vol. 100, pp. 57002, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  30. Galkina E. G, Ivanov B A, Savelev S and Nori F, “Chirality tunneling and quantum dynamics for domain walls in mesoscopic ferromagnets,” Physical reviews B, vol. 77, pp. 34425, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  31. Takagi S and Tatara G, “Macroscopic quantum coherence of chirality of domain wall in ferromagnets,” Physical reviews B, vol. 54, Num.14, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  32. Galkina E. G, Ivanov B. A, Savelév S and Nori Franco, “Chirality tunneling and quantum dynamics for domain walls in mesoscopic ferromagnets,” PHYSICAL REVIEW B, vol.77, pp. 134425, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  33. Malozemoff A P and Slonczewski J C, Magnetic domain walls in bubble materials, New York: Academic Press; 1979, pp 78.
     Google Scholar
  34. Mathieu Cormier, “Renversement d’aimantation dans des nanostructures par propagation de parois de domaines sous champ magnétique et courant électrique,”Thèse de Doctorat en Physique, Université Paris-Sud 11, France, 2008, pp. 29.
     Google Scholar
  35. Michel Remoissenet, Waves called solitons: concepts and experiments, 2nd edition, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag;1994.
     Google Scholar
  36. Yemélé D and kofané T. C, “Long-range effect on the periodic deformable Sine-Gordon chains,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol.11, Issue 11, pp. L75-L81, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  37. Webster J, Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, John Wiley &Sons, Inc; 1999.
     Google Scholar
  38. Morrish A. H, The physical principles of magnetism, New York: Wiley;1965.
     Google Scholar
  39. Potter R. I,“Digital magnetic recording theory,” IBM Thomas J. Watson research center, Yorktown heights, New York,10598, 1974.
     Google Scholar
  40. H. Neal Bertram, Hong Zhou and Roy Gustafson, “Signal to noise ratio scaling and density limit estimates in longitudinal magnetic recording,” IEEE Trans on Magn, vol. 34, No, 4, July 1998.
     Google Scholar
  41. Bertram H. N and Che X, “General analysis of noise in recorded transitions in thin film recording media,” IEEE Trans on Magn, vol. 29 No.1, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  42. Slutsky B and Bertram H. N, “Transition noise analysis of thin film magnetic recording media,” IEEE Trans on Magn, vol. 30, No.5, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  43. Karlqvist, “Calculation of the magnetic field in the ferromagnetic layer of a magnetic drum,” Trans. R. Inst. Technol Stockholm, vol. 86 pp. 3, 1954.
     Google Scholar
  44. Bertram H. N, Theory of magnetic recording, Cambridge, University Press; 1994, pp. 100.
     Google Scholar
  45. Middleton B. K, Recording and reproducing processes2nd Ed C.D. Mee, E.D. Daniel (Eds.), Magnetic Recording Handbook;1996, Chap. 2, pp. 30 and Chap.3, pp. 87.
     Google Scholar
  46. Aziz M. M, Signal and Noise Properties of Longitudinal Thin Film Disk Media, thesis Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, UK, 1999, Chap. 3 pp. 86-88.
     Google Scholar
  47. Plumer M. L, van J. E and Weller D, The physics of ultra-high-density magnetic recording, Springer Series in Surface Sciences,2001, PP. 26-27.
     Google Scholar
  48. Zhan Y and Bertram H. N, “PW50, D50 and playback voltage formulas for shield magnetoresistive heads,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol.81, pp. 4897, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  49. Zhan Y, Shtrikam S and Bertram H. N, “Playback pulse shape and spectra for shielded MR heads,” IEEE Trans on Magn, vol. 33, No. 2, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  50. Wang L and Han G,“Down track response of differential reader for high density magnetic recording” Data Storage Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2011.
     Google Scholar
  51. Kittel C, “Physical theory of ferromagnetic domains, “Reviews of modern physics, vol. 21, Number 4, 1949.
     Google Scholar
  52. Mougin A, Cormier M, Adam J. P, Metaxas P J and Ferré J, “Domain wall mobility stability and Walker breakdown in magnetic nanowires,” Europhysics Letters (EPL), vol. 78, pp. 57007, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  53. Marchon B. and Olson Terry, “Magnetic Spacing Trends: From LMR to PMR and Beyond,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, vol. 45, No.10, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  54. Middleton B. K, Miles J. J and Aziz M.M, “High-density recording on magnetic thin film disk media,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 188, pp.248-259, 1998.
     Google Scholar