Fluorescence of Atomic Hydrogen in Aqueous Media
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
It is shown that aqueous solutions of atomic hydrogen fluoresce under the action of UV irradiation. It is also shown that the spectra of this fluorescence have peaks whose maxima are close to the 5th and 6th lines of the Balmer series. All this made it possible to propose using this fluorescence to determine the concentration of atomic hydrogen in aqueous media, which seems relevant for both hydrogen energy and medicine. In addition, the possible involvement of this fluorescence in such phenomena as the blueness of the daytime sky, Cherenkov radiation and the Kirlian aura is analyzed here.
Introduction
It was initially discovered that after bubbling with hydrogen, water acquired the ability to fluoresce in the violet region under the influence of UV radiation. More detailed studies have shown that the fluorescence spectrum of this water has a peak with a maximum at a wavelength of ~410.2 nm [1], which is close to one of the lines of the Balmer series: 410.12 nm (m = 6) [2]. It was soon established that an identical fluorescence peak is characteristic of water in contact with metallic magnesium [1]. Both of these results, as well as the fact that atomic hydrogen is released from water when it comes into contact with metallic magnesium (2H2O + Mg → Mg(OH)2 + H2 [3]), gave reason to assume that atomic hydrogen present in the aqueous medium is capable of fluorescence [1].
It is probably worth adding that this assumption took into account the absence of theoretical grounds excluding the possibility of such fluorescence. Despite this, this assumption was further verified in a number of experiments.
Materials and Methods
To enrich aqueous media with atomic hydrogen, known chemical reactions were used here, undoubtedly accompanied by the release of hydrogen atoms.
All reagents used in these reactions were purchased from Ukrreahim (Ukraine).
A Cary Eclipse Varian (Austria) fluorescence spectrofluorometer was used to record the fluorescence spectra of wave media containing atomic hydrogen; the fluorescence under study is well excited by UV light in the range: 220 ÷ 300 nm.
Results
To begin with, it is worth noting that the validity of the proposed assumption was confirmed by a number of experiments; the results of two such experiments are presented below.
The first of the presented experiments studied the fluorescence of an aqueous solution of formic acid containing zinc oxide, using the ability of zinc oxide to catalyze the decomposition of formic acid into gaseous hydrogen and carbon dioxide: HCOOH → CO2 + 2H* [3]. Thus, it was established that such decomposition is accompanied by the appearance of a fluorescence peak (Fig. 1), the maximum of which (~360 nm) is located near the short-wave boundary of the Bulmer series: 364.56 nm (m = ∞) [2]; it is worth noting that this fluorescence was excited by UV light with a wavelength of 230 nm.
The second of the presented experiments studied the fluorescence of water when in contact with iron powder–in this case, the water decomposes with the release of hydrogen atoms: Fe + 2H2O → Fe (OH)2 + 2H* [3]. Thus, it has been established that such decomposition of water is accompanied by the appearance of a peak with a maximum at ~425 nm on its fluorescence spectra (Fig. 2, right spectrum); it was further concluded that this peak can be represented as the sum of two peaks, the maxima of which correspond to two lines of the Balmer series: 410.17 nm (m = 6)/2 + 434.04 nm (m = 5)/2 = 844.21 nm/2 nm = 422.105 nm [2]; it is worth noting that this fluorescence was excited by UV light with a wavelength of 260 nm.
In the latter case (Fig. 2), the blue dotted line shows a wavelength of ~423 nm, which is located midway between two adjacent lines of the Balmer series: 410.17 nm (m = 6) and 434.04 nm (m = 5): (410.17 + 434.04)/2 nm = 844.21/2 nm = 422.105 nm.
At the same time, the latter experiment also showed that the initial peak with a maximum at ~423 nm can shift to shorter wavelengths over time, effectively turning into a peak with a maximum near 365 nm (Fig. 2, left spectrum), which corresponds to the short-wavelength boundary of the Balmer series: 364.56 nm (m = ∞); the red dotted line (Fig. 2) shows the short-wave boundary of the Balmer series [2].
It is worth noting here that a similar shift of peaks to the short-wave region was also observed in the study of the fluorescence of water saturated with oxonium ions, namely H3O+ [4]. Although the reason for these shifts is still unclear, their recurrence forces us to acknowledge their reality.
Thus, there are experimental results demonstrating the ability of excited hydrogen atoms to fluoresce in aqueous media. It is these results that justify the proposed discussion of the practical and scientific significance of this type of fluorescence.
Discussion
It should be noted initially that the discovered ability of hydrogen atoms to fluoresce in aqueous media may be of interest to researchers of photolytic, sonolytic and catalytic decomposition of water [5]–[9], who undoubtedly need to determine the productivity of such decompositions. In particular, this same ability of hydrogen atoms may be of interest to supporters of hydrogen energy, who are trying to obtain gaseous hydrogen from water by decomposing it in the ways indicated [6], [8], [9]; in any case, the results of experiments with metallic magnesium give reason to assume that the intensity of the fluorescence in question is proportional to the concentration of hydrogen atoms [1]. Thus, the discovered ability of hydrogen atoms to fluoresce in aqueous media may have practical significance. (It is probably worth adding here that the ability of hydrogen atoms to fluoresce in an aqueous environment can be used to determine the degree of oxidation of the human body, allowing one to assess the patient’s predisposition to several diseases [10].)
At the same time, it seems that the discovered ability of hydrogen atoms to fluoresce in aqueous media may be of great importance for “pure” science, since it allows us to explain the nature of a number of optical phenomena, for example, the blueness of the daytime sky (Fig. 3); it is probably worth noting here that the nature of this blueness has been debated for many years [11].
Thus, the recorded intense radiation in the region of 400 ÷ 500 nm (Fig. 2) allows assuming that the blue color of the daytime sky is caused by the fluorescence of hydrogen atoms, which are formed during the interaction of hydrogen ions rising with evaporating water [12] with electrons of the solar wind: e– + H+ → H* [13]. In this case, solar UV radiation also excites the fluorescence of hydrogen atoms, as does the artificial UV radiation used in both the experiments presented here (Figs. 1, 2) and in the previous ones [1].
It is probably also worth considering that hydrogen atoms capable of fluorescing under the influence of solar UV radiation can be formed in the upper layers of the atmosphere under the influence of UV and γ-radiation, in fact, as a result of photolysis and radiolysis of water: H2O → H* + HO* [5], [14]. Given all this, it is entirely possible that it is the fluorescence of hydrogen atoms that saturate the water vapor of the upper atmosphere that determines the blueness of the daytime sky as seen from the Earth’s surface. (Certainly, similar considerations also allow assuming that this same fluorescence determines the blue color of the Earth’s atmosphere, visible from space.)
It can also be assumed that it is the fluorescence under consideration that is responsible for the occurrence of Cherenkov radiation in water (Fig. 4).
This assumption is supported by the fact that the initiators of this radiation are γ-radiation, β-radiation and sonic boom [2], [15]–[19], that is, factors that have a completely different nature and are united only by the fact that they all cause the appearance of hydrogen atoms in water. Thus, it seems that it is precisely this difference in the physical nature of the factors causing Cherenkov radiation that is the most convincing evidence of the validity of the proposed assumption. So, the discovered ability of atomic hydrogen to fluoresce in aqueous media allows proposing a completely new point of view on the nature of Cherenkov radiation, especially on its source.
It is worth noting that the undoubted advantage of the proposed source of Cherenkov radiation is that it significantly simplifies the whole picture and, in particular, does not require the use of electrons moving faster than light [2], [17]–[19]. At the same time, this source eliminates the need for numerous equations attempting to describe Cherenkov radiation caused by factors of various natures [2], [17]–[19]; it is perhaps worth noting separately that ongoing attempts to revise these equations [20] show that these very equations are not entirely satisfactory.
Reasoning in the same way, it is quite natural to assume that the same hydrogen atoms cause the Kirlian aura, i.e., the glow that appears around water objects exposed to alternating electric fields with frequencies of 10 ÷ 100 kHz (Fig. 5).
Before analyzing the proposed explanation of the Kirlian aura, it should be taken into account that such alternating electric fields cause a skin effect, which consists of pushing electrons out of conductors [21]. Therefore, the immediate environment of water and water-containing objects that are exposed to such alternating electric fields is enriched with electrons that are capable of reacting with hydrogen ions evaporating from water and, accordingly, generating fluorescent hydrogen atoms: e– + H+ → H*. Thus, it turns out that these same variable electric fields simultaneously promote both the expulsion of electrons from water and water-containing objects and the evaporation of water, undoubtedly protonated [12], thereby creating an environment enriched with hydrogen atoms, which generates the Kirlian aura.
For the sake of completeness of the description, it should be remembered that positively charged water, i.e., water saturated with protons or aqueous oxonium ions, namely H3O+ [3], [22], is capable of fluorescing red [4], [23]; apparently, the reddish colors of the cloud tops (Fig. 6A), undoubtedly enriched with positively charged water vapor [12] and sprites (Fig. 6B), representing ascending flows of hydrated protons [12], give an idea of such fluorescence.
Thus, it cannot be ruled out that the reddish colors in the Kirlian aura (Fig. 5) are partly due to the fluorescence of water evaporating under the influence of the same electric fields with frequencies of 10 ÷ 100 kHz; at the same time, the existence of an unmistakable red line in the Balmer series: 656.21 nm (m = 3) [2] should also be taken into account when explaining the multi-colored Kirlian aura.
Conclusion
Be that as it may, there are experimental data that give grounds to assume that hydrogen atoms are capable of fluorescence not only in the gaseous state but also in aqueous media. It seems that these data are useful to consider for both practitioners and theorists.
References
-
Pivovarenko Y. An alternative strategy in cancer chemotherapy, aimed not at killing cancer cells, but the recovery of their DNA, modified by active oxygen. Biomed Sci. 2020;3(5):94–8. doi: 10.11648/j.bs.20170305.12.
Google Scholar
1
-
Shpolsky EV. Atomic Physics. vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka; 1974. In Russian.
Google Scholar
2
-
Nekrasov BV. General Chemistry. vol. 1. Moscow: Chemistry; 1974. In Russian.
Google Scholar
3
-
Pivovarenko Y. Laser-induced fluorescence of wet porous silicon as laser-induced fluorescence ofH3O+. J PhotonicMater Technol. 2019;5(1):11–5. doi: 10.11648/j.jmpt.20190501.13.
Google Scholar
4
-
Penconi M, Rossi F, Ortica F, Elisei F, Gentili PL. Hydrogen production from water by photolysis, sonolysis and sonophotolysis with solid solutions of rare earth, gallium and indium oxides as heterogeneous catalysts. Sustainability. 2015;7(7):9310–25. doi: 10.3390/su7079310.
Google Scholar
5
-
Merouani S, Hamdaoui O, Rezgui Y, Guemin M. Computational engineering study of hydrogen production via ultrasonic cavitation in water. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(2):832–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.058.
Google Scholar
6
-
Sukhatskiy Y. Partial case of thermochemical analysis of cavitation sonolysis of water. Chem, Technol Appl Subst. 2020;3(1):39–44. doi: 10.23939/ctas2020.01.039. In Ukrainian.
Google Scholar
7
-
Merouani S, Hamdaoui O. Chapter in the Book: sustainable Green Chemical Processes and their Allied Application. NY: Springer; 2020.
Google Scholar
8
-
Merabet N, Kerboua K. Sonolytic and ultrasound-assisted techniques for hydrogen production: a review based on the role of ultrasound. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(41):17879–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.108.
Google Scholar
9
-
Pivovarenko Y. Intestinal hydrogen gas as co-creator of both human immunity and aura. J Clin Case Rep Studies. 2022;3(10):1–6. doi: 10.31579/2690-8808/146.
Google Scholar
10
-
Lilienfeld P. A blue sky history. Opt Photonics News. 2004;15(6):32–9. doi: 10.1364/OPN.15.6.000032.
Google Scholar
11
-
PivovarenkoY.Water evaporation as an electromagnetic phenomenon. Eur J Appl Phys. 2024;6(3):19–25. doi: 10.24018/ejphysics.2024.6.3.330.
Google Scholar
12
-
Ogilvie KW, Coplan MA. Solar wind composition. Rev Geophys. 1995;33(51):615–22. doi: 10.1029/95RG00122.
Google Scholar
13
-
Dzaugis ME, Spivack AJ, D’Hondt S. A quantitative model of water radiolysis and chemical production rates near radionuclide-containing solids. Radiat Phys Chem. 2015;115:127–34. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.06.011.
Google Scholar
14
-
Cherenkov PA. Visible light from clear liquids under the action of gamma radiation. C.R. (Dokl) Acad Sci URSS. 1934;2:451–4.
Google Scholar
15
-
Cherenkov P. Visible luminescence of pure liquids under the influence of γ-radiation. UspekhiFizicheskikhNauk (Adv Phys Sci). 1967;93(2):385–8. doi: 10.3367/UFNr.0093.196710n.0385.
Google Scholar
16
-
Jelley JV. Cherenkov radiation: its properties, occurrence, and uses. In Chapter in the Book: photochemical and Photobiological Reviews. Boston, MA: Springer; 1983. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4505-3_6.
Google Scholar
17
-
Feynman R, Layton R, Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. vol. 1. NY: Basic Books; 1986.
Google Scholar
18
-
Pfeifer RNC, Nieminen TA. Visualisation of Cerenkov radiation and the fields of a moving charge. Eur J Phys. 2006;27:521–9. doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/27/3/006.
Google Scholar
19
-
Chefranov SG. A new approach to the theory of Cherenkov radiation based on relativistic generalization of the Landau criterion. J Exp Theor Phys. 2004;99:296–310. doi: 10.1134/1.1800186.
Google Scholar
20
-
Beaty HW, Fink DG. Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers. NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2013.
Google Scholar
21
-
Olah GA. Onium Ions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
Google Scholar
22
-
Lew H. Electronic spectrum of H2O+. Can J Phys. 1976;54(20):2028–49. doi: 10.1139/p76-24.
Google Scholar
23
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Yuri Pivovarenko,
Torsion Fields as a Reality , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) -
Yuri Pivovarenko,
Water Evaporation as an Electromagnetic Phenomenon , European Journal of Applied Physics: Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)