Possible Perspective for Quantum Mechanics Interpretation: An Essay-Suggestion



Abstract Views
168

Downloads
128

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Sep 18, 2022
Published Oct 28, 2022
10.24018/ejphysics.2022.4.5.212

Abstract viewed = 168 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The idea of new-type articles, named “Perspectives”, announced recently by some leading journals, is suggested to be approached for the controversial question of quantum mechanics interpretation. Firstly, it is revealed briefly the unsatisfactory situation of the nowadays predominant doctrine about that question. Then some basic elements of the proposed approach are presented. Those elements refer to (i) uncertainty relations, (ii) distinction between own tasks of quantum mechanics and description of quantum measurements, (iii) defects of collapse scenarios for measurements, and (iv) depiction of quantum measurements as data transmission stochastic processes. The essay closes with some concluding remarks.

Keywords: Quantum Mechanics Interpretation, Shortcomings of the Existing Predominant Doctrine, Revaluation of Uncertainty Relations, Abandonment of Collapse Scenarios for Measurements, Quantum Measurements as Information Transmission Processes.

References

  1. Editorial: Introducing Perspective Articles, Phys. Rev. A 105, 2022.
     Google Scholar
  2. Wikipedia. Interpretations of quantum mechanics. [Internet] Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics.
     Google Scholar
  3. Wikipedia. Minority interpretations of quantum mechanics, [Internet] Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics.
     Google Scholar
  4. Dumitru S. Caducity of idea about wave function collapse as well new views on Schrodinger’s cat and quantum measurements. Progress in Physics, 2013; 9(1): 63–68; arXiv: 1210.4121v3.
     Google Scholar
  5. Dumitru S. A Survey on Uncertainty Relations and Quantum Measurements: Arguments for Lucrative Parsimony in Approaches of Matters. Progress in Physics, 2021; 17(1): 38-70. ISSN 1555-5534.
     Google Scholar
  6. Dumitru S. Can Schrodinger’s Cat Be Really a Quantum Touchstone? European Journal of Applied Physics. 2021; 3(3): 29–32. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2021.3.3.81.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bell JS. A private letter from the late scientist J. S. Bell to the present author, January 29, 1985. PostScript for quant-ph/0004013v1. [Internet] Retrieved from: arxiv:quant-ph/0004013v1 Fig.1.gif.
     Google Scholar
  8. Dumitru S. Routes of Quantum Mechanics Theories, Progress in Physics, July 2012:3. Letters to Progress in Physics L1.
     Google Scholar
  9. Dirac PAM. The evolution of the physicist’s picture of Nature. Scientific American, 1963; 208: 45–53.
     Google Scholar
  10. Bell JS. Against “measurement”. Physics World, 1990; 3: 33–40. Article reprinted also in some books containing Bell’s writings.
     Google Scholar
  11. Madelung E. Die Mathematischen Hilfsmittel der Physikers, Abs. 4, Quantentheorie. Springer-Verlag Berlin 1953.
     Google Scholar
  12. Bransden B.H., Joachain CJ. Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Harlow, Pearson Educational Ltd.; 2000.
     Google Scholar
  13. Schwabl F. Quantum Mechanics Fourth Edition. Berlin, Springer; 2007.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hossenfelder S. At the frontier of knowledge, arXiv: 1001.3538v1.
     Google Scholar
  15. Auletta G. Foundations and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Singapore, World Scientific; 2000.
     Google Scholar
  16. Albertson J. Quantum-mechanical measurement operator. Phys. Rev., 1963; 129: 940–943.
     Google Scholar
  17. Wikipedia. Communication channel, [Internet] Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_channel.
     Google Scholar
  18. Dumitru S. Phenomenological theory of recorded fluctuations. Phys. Lett. A., 1974; 48, 109–110.
     Google Scholar